4.6 Article

Needle-free cutaneous delivery of living human cells by Er:YAG fractional laser ablation

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 559-566

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2018.1472570

关键词

Topical delivery; Er:YAG laser; fractional laser ablation; epidermis; living cells; cell therapy; skin

资金

  1. Swiss Commission for Technology and Innovation [9307.1 PFLS-LS]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31200640/C0508, 21135004/B050901]
  3. Pantec Biosolutions AG

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Dermatological diseases, including most skin cancers and rare genetic conditions frequently originate in the epidermis. Targeted, topical cell-based therapy is a promising therapeutic strategy. Here, we present the first report demonstrating that fractional laser ablation enables local needle-free' intraepidermal delivery of living human cells. Methods: The cells penetrated porcine ear skin via microchannels created by Er:YAG fractional laser ablation; cell delivery was quantified using a haemocytometer. Cutaneous distribution was confirmed visually by laser scanning confocal microscopy and histological analysis. Results: Total cell delivery (sum of amounts permeated and deposited) after 24h increased from 5.7 +/- 0.1 x 10(5) to 9.6 +/- 1.6 x 10(5)cells/cm(2) when increasing pore density from 300 to 600pores/cm(2), - corresponding to 19- and 32-fold increases over the control. At 600pores/cm(2), cell deposition was 136-fold greater than cell permeation - the latter most likely due to transport from micropores into appendageal pathways. Production of GFP post-delivery confirmed cell remained viability. Conclusion: The results demonstrate the feasibility of using controlled laser microporation to achieve local needle-free' cutaneous delivery of living human cells to the epidermis and dermis. This raises the possibility of using this technique for targeted new approaches for dermatological therapy in these regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据