4.6 Review

Nanomedicine for immunosuppressive therapy: achievements in pre-clinical and clinical research

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 397-418

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2018.1420053

关键词

Immunosuppression; drug delivery; nanoparticles; cyclosporine A; tacrolimus; corticosteroids; methotrexate; sirolimus; mycophenolic acid; mycophenolate mofetil

资金

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR
  3. Alberta Innovates Health Soluction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Immunosuppression is the mainstay therapy in organ transplantation and autoimmune diseases. The effective clinical application of immunosuppressive agents has suffered from the emergence of systemic immunosuppression and/or individual drug side effects. Nanotechnology approaches may be used to modify the mentioned shortcomings by enhancing the delivery of immunosuppressants to target cells of the immune system, thus reducing the required dose for function, and/or reducing drug distribution to non-target tissues. Areas covered: We provide an overview on the development of nanotechnology products for the most commonly used immunosuppressive agents. At first, the rationale for the use of nanoparticles as means for immunosuppressive therapy is discussed. This is followed by a review of major accomplishments in this area, particularly in preclinical in vivo studies. Expert opinion: The results of research conducted in this area to date, points to a great promise for nano-medicine in increasing the bioavailability, reducing the toxicity, and/or potentiating the activity of immunosuppressive agents. It is, therefore, safe to speculate the more rapid translation of nanotechnology in clinical immunosuppressive therapy in the near future providing to the overcoming of hurdles associated with nano-drug delivery such as high cost, inadequate reproducibility and potential safety concerns of the delivery systems themselves.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据