4.4 Article

Effects of superhydrophobic surfaces on the flow around an NACA0012 hydrofoil at low Reynolds numbers

期刊

EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS
卷 59, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-018-2564-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. Disaster and Safety Management Institute - Korea Coast Guard of Korean government [KCG-01-2017-02]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2016R1C1B2012775, 2017R1A4A1015523]
  3. Korea government via SNU-IAMD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, the effects of superhydrophobic surface on the flow around an NACA0012 hydrofoil are experimentally investigated at low Reynolds number range of 0.2-1.0 . The velocity fields were measured using two-dimensional digital particle image velocimetry in a water tunnel while varying the angle of attack from to . The spray-coating of hydrophobic nanoparticles was used to create superhydrophobic surfaces. Depending on the Reynolds number and angle of attack, we found that the effects of superhydrophobic surface show up differently, which is determined by the relative strength of turbulence caused by both the surface slip (influence of trapped air pockets) and roughness, compared to that of background (i.e., uncontrolled) flow. In general, the superhydrophobic surface imposes a little influence on the wake behind a hydrofoil when the angle of attack is very low (attached flow) or high (fully separated flow). At intermediate angles of attack (flow separates between the leading and trailing edges), however, it is measured that the flow over superhydrophobic surface has a stronger turbulence, and thus, the enhanced shear-layer instability forces the early vortex rollup in the wake and reduction of vortex formation length. Interestingly, there is a transitional range of angle of attack, in which this effect is reversed, and thus, the vortex rollup is slightly delayed. This trend can be explained based on the changes in the uncontrolled flow structures, and finally, we classify the effects of superhydrophobic surface in terms of Reynolds number and angle of attack, in the considered ranges of both.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据