4.6 Article

Experimental characterization of oblique and asymmetric water entry

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCE
卷 92, 期 -, 页码 141-161

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2017.10.028

关键词

Asymmetric impact; Hydrodynamic loading; Hull slamming; Oblique impact; Particle image velocimetry; Pressure reconstruction; Water entry

资金

  1. Office of Naval Research [N00014-10-1-0988]
  2. Italian Ministry Program PRIN [20154EHYW9]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate prediction of fluid-structure interactions during water entry is of fundamental importance for the design of planing vessels. However, our understanding of the physics of water entry largely relies on simplified impact conditions, in which the body symmetrically strikes the water surface. In this work, we propose an integrated experimental and theoretical framework to isolate the effects of oblique and asymmetric impact on the water entry of a rigid wedge. Through particle image velocimetry (PIV) and a complementary array of sensors (including position sensors, accelerometers, and pressure sensors), we seek to elucidate the impact dynamics of a wedge and the associated flow physics. In a series of experiments, we systematically analyze the role of the heel and velocity angles on the pile-up evolution, hydrodynamic loading, and energy imparted to the fluid flow. The modified Logvinovich model is extended to study asymmetric and oblique impact for moderate deadrise angles, thereby offering further insight into the physics of the impact. Our results indicate that the heel angle remarkably influences the wedge dynamics, pile-up evolution, and velocity distribution, while the velocity angle has a critical role on the distribution of the hydrodynamic loading. These findings offer evidence for a complex interplay between geometric parameters on the water entry of rigid wedges, which could ultimately improve our understanding of planing vessels operating in real cruise conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据