4.6 Article

Coherent structures in the wake behind a trailing edge cutback

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCE
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 329-344

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.02.021

关键词

Trailing edge cutback; Flapping; Vortex merging; Coherent strutures

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11602143, 51276116]
  2. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [slg16004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An experimental study was performed to investigate the influence of coolant ejection on the aerodynamic characteristics of the unsteady wake behind a trailing edge cutback. A high-resolution planar particle image velocimetry (PIV) system was emlpoyed to conduct detailed flowfield measurements at a Reynolds number of Re-h = 2000. The time-averaged velocity fields, the distributions of reverse-flow intermitteny and velocity deficts were comparatively studied, and contours of streamwise Reynolds stress and shear stress were examined to disclose the influence of coolant ejection on wake aerodynamic performance. Proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) ananlysis was applied to the velocity flowflleds to disclose the evolution of coherent structures and the mixing process between the cooling stream and mainstream. Large scale coherent structures shed from both the lip and lower plates were identified in low-order modes, indicating that these are the most energtic structures in the wake. Moreover, a strip structure was found in the unpaired third eigemode for lower blowing cases (VR = 0.5 and 0.75). By POD filtering with first six eigenmodes, the flapping motion of the separated shear layer from the upper shear layer of the lower plate was observed. Coherent strucutres were identified from the contours of swirling strength. It is speculated that the strip structure and the flapping of the seprarated shear layer is resuled from vortex merging, i.e., the merging of two clockwise-rotating vortical structures shed from the upper shear layers of the lip and lower plates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据