4.1 Article Data Paper

γ-tubulin is differentially expressed in mitotic and non-mitotic cardiomyocytes in the regenerating zebrafish heart

期刊

DATA IN BRIEF
卷 3, 期 -, 页码 71-77

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2015.01.005

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [310030_138062, CRSII3_147675]
  2. Schweizerische Stiftung fur die Erforschung der Muskelkrankheiten
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030_138062, CRSII3_147675] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This data article contains complementary figures related to the research article entitled, A dual epimorphic and compensatory mode of heart regeneration M(J], http://dx.doLorg/10.101G/j.ydbio.2014.12.002), which presents a spatial and temporal characterization of cardiomyocyte proliferation and dedifferentiation after cryoinjury-incluced myocardial infarction. This study demonstrated that mitotic divisions occur in cardiac cells at distinct differentiation status, namely in dedifferentiated cells at the injury border as well as in mature cardiac cells within the remaining intact myocardium. One of the important aspects supporting our conclusions is a characterization of proteins that are upregulated during mitosis in the regenerating hearts. The data presented here reveal a dynamic change in the expression level and in the subcellular distribution of gamma-tubulin between mitotic and non mitotic cardiac cells. We report that in the non-mitotic cells, gamma-tubulin expression is restricted to the centrosome. By contrast, during the mitosis, gamma-tubulin strongly expands its localization within the spindle apparatus that interacts with the condensed chromosomes. We demonstrated that the differential distribution of gamma-tubulin in non-mitotic and mitotic cells requires adjusted image processing for the appropriate visualization of both expression patterns in the same histological specimens. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据