4.5 Article

Muller glial cells of the primate foveola: An electron microscopical study

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL EYE RESEARCH
卷 167, 期 -, 页码 110-117

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2017.12.004

关键词

Muller cell; Fovea; Ultrastructure; Human; Primate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies on the ultrastructure of the primate foveola suggested the presence of an inverted cone-like structure which is formed by 25-35 specialized Muller cells overlying the area of high photoreceptor density. We investigated the ultrastructure of the Muller cells in the foveola of a human and macaque retina. Sections through the posterior poles of an eye of a 40 years-old human donor and an eye of an adult cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis) were investigated with transmission electron microscopy. The foveola consisted of an inner layer (thickness, 5.5-12 mu m) which mainly contained somata (including nuclei) and inner processes of Muller cells; this layer overlaid the central Henle fibers and outer nuclear layer. The inner layer contained numerous watery cysts and thin lamelliform and tubular Muller cell processes which spread along the inner limiting membrane (ILM). The cytoplasm of the outer Muller cell processes became increasingly dispersed and electron lucent in the course towards the outer limiting membrane. The ILM of the foveola was formed by a very thin basal lamina (thickness, < 40 nm) while the basal lamina of the parafovea was thick (0.9-1 mu m). The data show that there are various conspicuous features of foveolar Muller cells. The numerous thin Muller cell processes below the ILM may smooth the inner surface of the foveola (to minimize image distortion resulting from varying light refraction angles at an uneven retinal surface), create additional barriers to the vitreous cavity (compensating the thinness of the ILM), and provide mechanical stability to the tissue. The decreasing density of the outer process cytoplasm may support the optical function of the foveola.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据