3.8 Article

Peer Attachment and Cyber Aggression Involvement among Chinese, Indian, and Japanese Adolescents

期刊

SOCIETIES
卷 5, 期 2, 页码 339-353

出版社

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/soc5020339

关键词

cyberbullying; cyber aggression; cyber victimization; peer attachment; individualism; collectivism; culture; China; India; Japan; adolescents

资金

  1. European Social Fund [CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.0037]
  2. Czech Republic
  3. JSPS KAKENHI [26870535]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26870535] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Significant advancements have been made in cyber aggression literature, with many studies revealing the consequences associated with adolescents' involvement in these behaviors. Few studies have focused on cyber aggression involvement in China, India, and Japan. The present study examined differences in cyber aggression perpetration and victimization among 1637 adolescents living in China, India, and Japan, while controlling for face-to-face bullying involvement, individualism, and collectivism. Another aim of the present study was to examine country of origin and cyber aggression involvement (i.e., the uninvolved, cyberaggressor-cybervictims, cyberaggressors, and cybervictims) differences in peer attachment. Findings revealed that adolescents from India had the highest levels of cyber aggression involvement when compared to adolescents from China or Japan. Chinese adolescents engaged in more cyber aggression perpetration and were victimized more by cyber aggression when compared to Japanese adolescents. No country of origin differences were found for peer attachment. However, uninvolved adolescents reported higher levels of peer attachment when compared to the other groups. Cyberaggressor-cybervictims had the lowest levels of peer attachment, followed by cybervictims and cyberaggressors. These results suggest that there should be concern about cyber aggression involvement among adolescents in these countries, especially in India, where cyber aggression research has been slow to develop.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据