3.8 Article

Development of a Skeletal Muscle Mimic Phantom Compatible with QCT and MR Imaging

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2014.10.002

关键词

Muscle phantom; QCT and MRI compatible; T2 relaxation time; density; EDTA; CuCl2

资金

  1. Vanier CGS Award [CGV-104858]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop a skeletal muscle mimic phantom compatible with quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and magnetic resonance imaging, yielding physiologically appropriate values. Methods: Agar-based phantoms contained varying concentrations of CuCl2 and EDTA to adjust T2 relaxation time and phantom density concurrently. T2 relaxation times were quantified using a 4-mm singleslice fast spin echo sequence repeated for six serial echo times at 937-mm resolution. T2 relaxation maps were generated using the Levenberg-Marquardt equation. A peripheral QCT scanner measured linear attenuation coefficients of phantoms, which were converted to density (mg/cm(3)) values. Five 2.3 +/- 0.5 mm thick slices were acquired at 15 mm/s scan speed and 500-mm resolution. Logarithmic or linear regression models were fitted to EDTA or CuCl2 versus density and T2 relaxation data. Results: Density (D) was linearly dependent on CuCl2 (D = 0.27 [CuCl2] + 63.92, R-2 = 0.84, P = 0.01) and invariant to EDTA. T2 relaxation time was related negatively to CuCl2 (T2 = -10.13 ln [CuCl2] + 66.70, R-2 = 0.91, P < .01) and positively to EDTA (T2 = 5.72 ln [EDTA] + 54.47, R-2 = 0.86, P < .01). Reproducibility within and between phantoms of the same compositions was acceptable (<5% error). Long-term stability was achieved for density but poorer for T2 relaxation time. Conclusions: This phantom optimization method provides a means for altering a soft tissue phantom suited for calibrating magnetic resonance imaging and QCT signals within values representative of muscle. Phantoms can be used during scans for calibrating magnetic resonance signals between and within individuals over time and can cross-calibrate different scanners.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据