4.7 Article

Welding techniques for battery cells and resulting electrical contact resistances

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 1, 期 -, 页码 7-14

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2015.04.001

关键词

Battery assembly; Electrical contact resistance; Lithium-ion battery; Welding

资金

  1. Bavarian Ministry of Economic Affairs and Media, Energy and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In large battery assemblies, which are integrated, for example, in electric vehicles or stationary storage systems, up to several thousand single battery cells are connected together. Every single cell connection influences the functionality and efficiency of the whole battery system. Resistance spot, ultrasonic or laser beam welding are mostly used for connecting battery cells in the production of large battery assemblies. Each of these welding techniques has its own characteristics depending on the material properties and contact geometry. Cell casing and terminal dimensions may constrain possible contact geometries. For example, pouch cells provide detached tabs, whereas cells with hard casing provide a certain area of the casing for electrical connection. Consequently, it is a challenging task to find the most suitable welding technique and welding parameters for each individual battery assembly. This paper presents a comprehensive overview on joining battery cells by resistance spot, ultrasonic and laser beam welding. The specific features, advantages and dependencies of each welding technique for connecting cells are discussed. In addition, a quantitative analysis on welded test samples reveals the ultimate tensile strength and heat input into a battery cell. A novel measuring and calculation method was designed and applied to assess the electrical contact resistance itself. The electrical contact resistance occurs as a result of the joint and not in the bulk material. Therefore, it is a criterion which may be transferred to any size of joint partners. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据