4.5 Article

ZW, XY, and yet ZW: Sex chromosome evolution in snakes even more complicated

期刊

EVOLUTION
卷 72, 期 8, 页码 1701-1707

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/evo.13543

关键词

Heterochiasmy; heteromorphic sex chromosomes; reptiles; sex determination; Squamata

资金

  1. Grant Agency of Charles University [GAUK 1073416]
  2. Charles University PRIMUS Research Program [PRIMUS/SCI/46]
  3. Czech Science Foundation [17-22141Y]
  4. Charles University Research Centre program [204069]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Snakes are historically important in the formulation of several central concepts on the evolution of sex chromosomes. For over 50 years, it was believed that all snakes shared the same ZZ/ZW sex chromosomes, which are homomorphic and poorly differentiated in basal snakes such as pythons and boas, while heteromorphic and well differentiated in advanced (caenophidian) snakes. Recent molecular studies revealed that differentiated sex chromosomes are indeed shared among all families of caenophidian snakes, but that boas and pythons evolved likely independently male heterogamety (XX/XY sex chromosomes). The historical report of heteromorphic ZZ/ZW sex chromosomes in a bold snake was previously regarded as ambiguous. In the current study, we document heteromorphic ZZ/ZW sex chromosomes in a boid snake. A comparative approach suggests that these heteromorphic sex chromosomes evolved very recently and that they are poorly differentiated at the sequence level. Interestingly, two snake lineages with confirmed male heterogamety possess homomorphic sex chromosomes, but heteromorphic sex chromosomes are present in both snake lineages with female heterogamety. We point out that this phenomenon is more common across squamates. The presence of female heterogamety in non-caenophidian snakes indicates that the evolution of sex chromosomes in this lineage is much more complex than previously thought, making snakes an even better model system for the evolution of sex chromosomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据