4.6 Review

A Systematic Review and Framework for the Use of Hormone Therapy with Salvage Radiation Therapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer

期刊

EUROPEAN UROLOGY
卷 73, 期 2, 页码 156-165

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.06.027

关键词

Prostate cancer; Salvage radiotherapy; Hormone therapy; Systematic review

资金

  1. Prostate Cancer Foundation Young Investigator Award
  2. Varian
  3. Medivation/Astellas
  4. Celgene
  5. SALV-ENZA clinical trial
  6. Myriad Genetics
  7. GenomeDx
  8. MDxHealth

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) is a standard of care for men who recur postprostatectomy, and recent randomized trials have assessed the benefit and toxicity of adding hormone therapy (HT) to SRT with differing results. Objective: To perform a systematic review of randomized phase III trials of the use of SRT +/- HT and generate a framework for the use of HT with SRT. Evidence acquisition: Systematic literature searches were conducted on February 15, 2017 in three databases (MEDLINE [via PubMed], EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov) for human-only randomized clinical trials from January 30, 1990, through January 30, 2017. Only two randomized trials met all inclusion criteria. Evidence synthesis: Overall survival benefits from HT were found in one trial, which was limited to when follow-up extended to >= 10 yr, pre-SRT prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >= 0.7 ng/ml, or when higher Gleason grade or positive margins were present. Both trials demonstrated a benefit from HT in men with higher pre-SRT PSAs. Three prognostic factors appeared to discriminate improvements in meaningful clinical endpoints (eg, distant metastasis or survival): pre-SRT PSA, Gleason score, and margin status. Two years of bicalutamide monotherapy resulted in higher rates of gynecomastia with a trend for worse survival when given in favorable risk patients, and 6 mo of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist therapy resulted in higher rates of hot flashes and long-term hypertension. Conclusions: Similar to the selective use of HT with radiotherapy in localized prostate cancer, not all patients appear to derive a meaningful benefit from HT with SRT. Patient, tumor, and treatment factors must be considered when recommending the use of HT with SRT. Knowledge gaps exist in the level 1 data regarding the optimal duration and type of HT, as well as the ability to use predictive biomarkers to personalize the use of HT with SRT. Important clinical trials (RADICALS and NRG GU-006) are aimed to answer these questions. Patient summary: In this report, we performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the benefit and harm of adding hormone therapy to salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for recurrent prostate cancer. We found that the benefit of hormone therapy varied by important prognostic factors, including pre-SRT prostate-specific antigen, Gleason grade, and surgical margin status. Our group then developed a framework on how best to utilize hormone therapy with SRT. (c) 2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据