4.6 Article

Intravenous Mannitol Versus Placebo During Partial Nephrectomy in Patients with Normal Kidney Function: A Double-blind, Clinically-integrated, Randomized Trial

期刊

EUROPEAN UROLOGY
卷 73, 期 1, 页码 53-59

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.038

关键词

Mannitol; Partial nephrectomy; Renal function; Nephron-sparing surgery

资金

  1. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
  2. NIH/NCI Cancer Center [P30 CA008748]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Mannitol is currently used as a renal protective agent to mitigate the effects of renal ischemia during nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). This routine practice lacks rigorous methodological study. Objective: To assess the effect on renal function outcomes after surgery of mannitol infusion prior to renal ischemia during NSS. Design, setting, participants: This prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial included 199 patients with a preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >45 ml/min/1.73m(2) scheduled for NSS; the trial was conducted between July 2012 and July 2015. Intervention: Patients undergoing NSS were randomized to receive mannitol (12.5 g) or placebo intravenously within 30 min prior to renal vascular clamping. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary outcome was the difference in eGFR (renal function) between the two groups at 6 mo following surgery assessed with an analysis of covariance model using preoperative eGFR, treatment group, and surgical approach as covariates. Results and limitations: At baseline, the median age of the patients was 58 yr, and the median eGFR was 88 ml/min/1.73m(2). Comparing placebo with mannitol infusion, the adjusted difference of 0.2 eGFR units at 6 mo was not significant (p = 0.9), with the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval (-3.1 to 3.5) excluding a clinically relevant effect of mannitol. Limitations include evaluation of a single mannitol dose and patients all had excellent preoperative renal function. Conclusions: Intraoperative 12.5 g mannitol infusion during NSS has no demonstrable clinical benefit when compared with standardized fluid hydration in patients with normal preoperative renal function, and its use in this setting is not warranted. (c) 2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据