4.7 Article

To share or not to share? Expected pros and cons of data sharing in radiological research

期刊

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
卷 28, 期 6, 页码 2328-2335

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5165-5

关键词

Confidentiality; Database; Data sharing; Information dissemination; Radiology

资金

  1. IRCCS Policlinico San Donato
  2. Italian Ministry of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aims of this paper are to illustrate the trend towards data sharing, i.e. the regulated availability of the original patient-level data obtained during a study, and to discuss the expected advantages (pros) and disadvantages (cons) of data sharing in radiological research. Expected pros include the potential for verification of original results with alternative or supplementary analyses (including estimation of reproducibility), advancement of knowledge by providing new results by testing new hypotheses (not explored by the original authors) on pre-existing databases, larger scale analyses based on individual-patient data, enhanced multidisciplinary cooperation, reduced publication of false studies, improved clinical practice, and reduced cost and time for clinical research. Expected cons are outlined as the risk that the original authors could not exploit the entire potential of the data they obtained, possible failures in patients' privacy protection, technical barriers such as the lack of standard formats, and possible data misinterpretation. Finally, open issues regarding data ownership, the role of individual patients, advocacy groups and funding institutions in decision making about sharing of data and images are discussed. aEuro cent Regulated availability of patient-level data of published clinical studies (data-sharing) is expected. aEuro cent Expected benefits include verification/advancement of knowledge, reduced cost/time of research, clinical improvement. aEuro cent Potential drawbacks include faults in patients' identity protection and data misinterpretation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据