4.5 Article

Standard-Essential Patents

期刊

JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY
卷 123, 期 3, 页码 547-586

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/680995

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council under the European Community [249429]
  2. National Science Foundation [0830288]
  3. Harvard Business School's Division of Research
  4. Microsoft
  5. Orange
  6. Qualcomm
  7. European Research Council (ERC) [249429] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  8. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0830288] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A major policy issue in standard setting is that patents that are ex ante not that important, by being included into a standard, may become standard-essential patents. In an attempt to curb the monopoly power that they create, most standard-setting organizations require the owners of patents covered by the standard to make a loose commitment to grant licenses on reasonable terms. Such commitments unsurprisingly are conducive to litigation. This paper builds a framework for the analysis of these patents, identifies several types of inefficiencies attached to the lack of price commitments, and shows how structured price commitments restore competition and why such commitments may not arise spontaneously in the marketplace.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据