4.7 Article

Thermoregulatory behaviour limits local adaptation of thermal niches and confers sensitivity to climate change

期刊

FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY
卷 29, 期 8, 页码 1038-1047

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12406

关键词

body temperature; climate change; critical thermal limits; niche conservatism; Sceloporus; thermoregulation

类别

资金

  1. DOE's National Institute for Climate Change Research [10-NICCR-1108]
  2. National Science Foundation [EF-1065856, EF-1065638]
  3. Emerging Frontiers
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [1346899] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Emerging Frontiers
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [1065856] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermoregulation buffers environmental variation, which enables a species to persist during climate change but ultimately hinders adaptation of thermal tolerance by weakening selective pressure. We used a model of optimal thermal physiology to demonstrate how thermoregulatory behaviour limits local adaptation of thermal physiology in a widespread group of lizards, the Sceloporus undulatus complex. Empirical data for seven populations demonstrates conservatism of thermal tolerance, consistent with the model's prediction in the case of effective thermoregulation. In an eighth population, from a region where thermoregulation should be less effective, we observed greater heat tolerance and poorer cold tolerance, as predicted by our model. Biophysical modelling indicates that lizards can avoid heat stress through thermoregulation in the coming decades but will ultimately experience an abrupt decline in the effectiveness of thermoregulation. In this scenario, thermoregulators will suffer a greater loss of performance in future climates than thermoconformers will, unless heat tolerance can evolve in a few generations. Our analyses raises a concern that behavioural plasticity, while beneficial in the short term, will ultimately limit the physiological adaptation required to endure a warming climate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据