4.7 Article

ON THE INTRINSIC DIVERSITY OF TYPE II-PLATEAU SUPERNOVAE

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 806, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/225

关键词

methods: statistical; stars: distances; supernovae: general

资金

  1. NASA - Space Telescope Science Institute [HST-HF-51327.01-A]
  2. NASA [NAS 5-26555]
  3. Ministry of Economy, Development, and Tourism's Millennium Science Initiative [IC120009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogen-rich Type II-Plateau supernovae (SNe) exhibit correlations between the plateau luminosity L-pl, the nickel mass M-Ni, the explosion energy E-exp, and the ejecta mass M-ej. Using our global, self-consistent, multi-band model of nearby well-observed SNe, we find that the covariances of these quantities are strong and that the confidence ellipsoids are oriented in the direction of the correlations, which reduces their significance. By proper treatment of the covariance matrix of the model, we discover a significant intrinsic width to the correlations between L-pl, E-exp and M-Ni, where the uncertainties due to the distance and the extinction dominate. For fixed E-exp, the spread in M-Ni is about 0.25 dex, which we attribute to the differences in the progenitor internal structure. We argue that the effects of incomplete gamma-ray trapping are not important in our sample. Similarly, the physics of the Type II-Plateau SN light curves leads to inherently degenerate estimates of E-exp and M-ej, which makes their observed correlation weak. Ignoring the covariances of SN parameters or the intrinsic width of the correlations causes significant biases in the slopes of the fitted relations. Our results imply that Type II-Plateau SN explosions are not described by a single physical parameter or a simple one-dimensional trajectory through the parameter space, but instead reflect the diversity of the core and surface properties of their progenitors. We discuss the implications for the physics of the explosion mechanism and possible future observational constraints.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据