4.5 Review

A novel mechanism of depression: role for connexins

期刊

EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 28, 期 4, 页码 483-498

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.01.009

关键词

Depression; Connexins; Gap junction; Hemichannels

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81573636, 81773924, U1402221, 81560663]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [7182114]
  3. PUMC Youth Fund [3332016058]
  4. CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) [2016-I2M-1-004]
  5. Scientific Research Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Hunan Province [15K091]
  6. Beijing Key Laboratory of New Drug Mechanisms and Pharmacological Evaluation Study [BZ0150]
  7. State Key Laboratory Fund Open Project [GTZK201610]
  8. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2013M540066]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a chronic and debilitating illness that affects over 350 million people worldwide; however, current treatments have failed to cure or prevent the progress of depression. Increasing evidence suggests a crucial role for connexins in MDD. In this review, we have summarised recent accomplishments regarding the role of connexins, gap junctions, and hemichannels in the aetiology of MDD, and discussed the limitations of current research. A blockage of gap junctions or hemichannels induces depressive behaviour. Possible underlying mechanisms include the regulation of neurosecretory functions and synaptic activity by gap junctions and hemichannels. Gap junctions are functionally inhibited under stress conditions. Conversely, hemichannel permeability is increased. Antidepressants inhibit hemichannel permeability; however, they have contrasting effects on the function of gap junctions under normal conditions and can protect them against stress. In conclusion, the blockage of hemichannels concurrent with improvements in gap junction functionality might be potential targets for depression treatment. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. and ECNP. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据