4.2 Article

Short- and long-term outcomes of surgical management of peptic ulcer complications in the era of proton pump inhibitors

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-017-0898-z

关键词

Peptic ulcer; Peptic ulcer perforation; Peptic ulcer hemorrhage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeWe evaluated the short-term and long-term outcomes of emergency operations for peptic ulcer (PUD) complications in a period of time in which the need for surgery is infrequent.MethodsRetrospective review of operated patients (2007-2015) in one medical center.Results81 patients were included (8.9 patients/year): 70 (86.4%) male; 11 (13.6%) female. Indications for operation were hemorrhage in 18 (22.2%), perforation in 62 (76.5%) and gastric-outlet obstruction in one (1.2%). Only 16 (19.8%) operations included a procedure to reduce gastric acid secretion. Six (7.4%) patients had a second operation for recurrent or persistent complication. Of these, two had a procedure to reduce gastric acid secretion in their first operation. 16 (19.8%) patients died during the index hospitalization. Three (3.7%) patients were rehospitalized for a PUD complication following 3-24months. One patient, who had surgery for a second perforation 3months following the first operation, was treated empirically for Helicobacter Pylori (HP) between the two operations. In comparison to perforation, patients with hemorrhage were older (69.920.3 vs. 52.1 +/- 19.9years; p=0.0015), more commonly had a history of PUD or treatment by nonsteroidal anti-inflammotry drugs (55.6 vs. 19.4%; p=0.0054), more commonly had a procedure to reduce gastric acid secretion during their index operation (61.1 vs. 6.5%; p<0.0001), and had a higher mortality (38.9 vs. 14.5%; p=0.0406).ConclusionsMortality is high following surgery for the complications of PUD, moreso in patients undergoing surgery for hemorrhage. Reoperations and repeated hospitalizations for complications are not uncommon, even in patients who have had procedures to reduce gastric acid secretion and HP eradication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据