4.5 Article

Is the adsorption of soil organic matter to haematite (-Fe2O3) temperature dependent?

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE
卷 69, 期 5, 页码 892-901

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ejss.12694

关键词

-

资金

  1. C. Gus Glasscock Jr. Endowed Fund for Excellence in Environmental Sciences
  2. National Science Foundation [1451512]
  3. Direct For Education and Human Resources
  4. Division Of Graduate Education [1451512] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil organic matter interactions with minerals are a key determinant in the long-term protection and sequestration of carbon in soils and sediments. Climate warming could potentially alter the dynamics of the Earth's largest carbon pools through processes controlling the formation of mineral-organic associations (MOAs). We studied the adsorption of Elliott soil humic acid (HA) and fulvic acid (FA) to the iron oxide mineral haematite (-Fe2O3) at temperatures from 15 to 35 degrees C through batch sorption experiments. The G degrees, H degrees and S degrees of sorption were derived for HA and FA and suggested that formation of MOAs was spontaneous and exothermic. The Langmuir sorption coefficients for HA and FA decreased with warming, but the maximum sorption capacities were not temperature dependent. The decrease in sorption coefficient was less when the temperature was increased from 30 to 35 degrees C than from 15 to 30 degrees C. Our infrared, ultraviolet and visible spectroscopy analysis of the bound and unbound HA and FA revealed preferential adsorption of oxygen- and hydrogen-substituted aromatic and aliphatic carbon, which was independent of temperature. The adsorption of a hydrophobic probe molecule, Rose Bengal, to haematite increased with warming. Our results suggest that (i) MOAs in warmer climates might be less sensitive to temperature changes, (ii) the amount of iron oxide-associated organic matter might remain unchanged with warming and (iii) hydrophobic interactions with iron oxides may be temperature dependent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据