4.3 Article

Nitrogenase expression in estuarine bacterioplankton influenced by organic carbon and availability of oxygen

期刊

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS
卷 362, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnv105

关键词

bacterial activity; limiting factors; nitrogen fixation

资金

  1. Danish Council for Independent Research, Natural Sciences [09-066396, 11-105450]
  2. NSF OCE [1130495]
  3. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  4. Directorate For Geosciences [1130495] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The genetic capacity to fix gaseous nitrogen (N) is distributed among diverse diazotrophs belonging to the Bacteria and Archaea. However, only a subset of the putative diazotrophs present actively fix N at any given time in the environment. We experimentally tested whether the availability of carbon and inhibition by oxygen constrain N fixation by diazotrophs in coastal seawater. The goal was to test whether by alleviating these constraints an increased overlap between nitrogenase (nifH)-gene-carrying and -expressing organisms could be achieved. We incubated water from a eutrophic but N-limited fjord in Denmark under high-carbon/low-oxygen conditions and determined bacterial growth and production, diazotrophic community composition (Illumina nifH amplicon sequencing), and nifH gene abundance and expression [ quantitative PCR (qPCR) and quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR)]. Bacterial abundances and production increased under high-carbon/low-oxygen conditions as did the similarity between present and active diazotrophic communities. This was caused by the loss of specific abundant yet non-active gammaproteobacterial phylotypes and increased expression by others. The prominent active gamma- and epsilonproteobacterial diazotrophs did not, however, respond to these conditions in a uniform way, highlighting the difficulty to assess how a change in environmental conditions may affect a diverse indigenous diazotrophic community.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据