4.7 Review

Degradation data analysis and remaining useful life estimation: A review on Wiener-process-based methods

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
卷 271, 期 3, 页码 775-796

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.033

关键词

Reliability; Degradation modeling; Remaining useful life; Wiener process; Prognostics and health management; Condition-based maintenance

资金

  1. NSFC [61473094, 61673311, 61573365, 61573366, 61573076, 61773386]
  2. Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program (YESS) of China Association for Science and Technology (CAST) [2016QNRC001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Degradation-based modeling methods have been recognized as an essential and effective approach for lifetime and remaining useful life (RUL) estimations for various health management activities that can be scheduled to ensure reliable, safe, and economical operation of deteriorating systems. As one of the most popular stochastic modeling methods, the previous several decades have witnessed remarkable developments and extensive applications of Wiener-process-based methods. However, there is no systematic review particularly focused on this topic. Therefore, this paper reviews recent modeling developments of the Wiener-process-based methods for degradation data analysis and RUL estimation, as well as their applications in the field of prognostics and health management (PHM). After a brief introduction of conventional Wiener-process-based degradation models, we pay particular attention to variants of the Wiener process by considering nonlinearity, multi-source variability, covariates, and multivariate involved in the degradation processes. In addition, we discuss the applications of the Wiener-process-based models for degradation test design and optimal decision-making activities such as inspection, condition-based maintenance (CBM), and replacement. Finally, we highlight several future challenges deserving further studies. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据