4.7 Article

Surmounting the resistance against EGFR inhibitors through the development of thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidine-based dual EGFR/HER2 inhibitors

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 155, 期 -, 页码 316-336

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.06.011

关键词

Dual EGFR/HER2 inhibitors; EGFR inhibitors resistance; Thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidine

资金

  1. Science and Technology Development Fund, Cairo, Egypt (STDF) [25284]
  2. STDF [5251]
  3. AIRC [17959]
  4. FIRC
  5. CNR (Epigen) CNR
  6. Horizon 2020 grants

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In light of the emergence of resistance against the currently available EGFR inhibitors, our study focuses on tackling this problem through the development of dual EGFR/HER2 inhibitors with improved enzymatic affinities. Guided by the binding mode of the marketed dual EGFR/HER2 inhibitor, Lapatinib, we proposed the design of dual EGFR/HER2 inhibitors based on the 6-phenylthieno[2,3-d]pyrimidine as a core scaffold and hinge binder. After two cycles of screening aiming to identify the optimum aniline headgroup and solubilizing group, we eventually identified 27b as a dual EGFR/HER2 inhibitor with IC50 values of 91.7 nM and 1.2 mu M, respectively. Notably, 27b dramatically reduced the viability of various patient-derived cancer cells preferentially overexpressing EGFR/HER2 (A431, MDA-MBA-361 and SKBr3 with IC50 values of 1.45, 3.5 and 4.83 mu M, respectively). Additionally, 27b efficiently thwarted the proliferation of lapatinib-resistant human non-small lung carcinoma (NCI-H1975) cells, harboring T790 M mutation, with IC50 of 4.2 mu M. Consistently, 27b significantly blocked EGF-induced EGFR activation and inactivated its downstream AKT/mTOR/S6 signalling pathway triggering apoptotic cell death in NCI-H1975 cells. The present study presents a promising candidate for further design and development of novel EGFR/HER2 inhibitors capable of overcoming EGFR TKIs resistance. (C) 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据