4.7 Article

High anticancer potency on tumor cells of dehydroabietylamine Schiff-base derivatives and a copper(II) complex

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 146, 期 -, 页码 451-459

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.01.041

关键词

Dehydroabietylamine; Schiff-base; Anticancer apoptosis

资金

  1. Sate Key Laboratory for Chemistry and Molecular Engineering of Medicinal Resources (Guangxi Normal University) [CMEMR2017-B06]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21372117]
  3. priority academic program development of Jiangsu higher education institutions, PAPD
  4. Doctorate Fellowship Foundation of Nanjing Forestry University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Five bioactive dehydroabietylamine Schiff-base derivatives (L-1-L-5) had been synthesized from Dehydroabietylamine (L-0), and the complex Cu(L-1)(2) had been obtained from the compound L-1 and copper(II) acetate. Their activities against Hela (cervix), MCF-7 (breast), A549 (lung), HepG2 (liver) and HUVEC (umbilical vein, normal cell) in vitro were investigated. The toxicity of L-1-L-5 and Cu(L-1)(2) was all lower than L-0. For MCF-7 cell, L-1, L-3, L-4, L-5 and Cu(L-1)(2) had higher antitumor activity than L. The smallest IC50 value was 2.58 AM of L-5. For A549 cell, the IC50 value of the compound L-4 was smaller than L, which indicated that the compound L-4 had higher anti-A549 activity than L. For HepG2 cell, the IC50 value of L-4 (0.24 mu M) and L-5 (0.14 mu M) were much smaller than L-0, which suggested L-4 and L-5 had higher anti-HepG2 activity. L-5 was 180 times more effective at inhibiting cultured HepG2 cells survival than normal cells, with average IC50 values of 0.14 and 25.56 AM, Furthermore, L, L-4 and L-5 contrasting with Doxorubicin had been measured with the ability to induce apoptosis. It turned out that L-4 and L-5 could induce more HepG2 cells apoptosis, which suggested they may be potential antitumor drugs. (C) 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据