4.7 Article

Discovery of novel 2,4-diarylaminopyrimidine analogues as ALK and ROS1 dual inhibitors to overcome crizotinib-resistant mutants including G1202R

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 143, 期 -, 页码 123-136

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.11.008

关键词

2,4-Diarylaminopyrimidine; Dual inhibitor; ALK; ROS1; Crizotinib-resistant

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81673308]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province [201602703]
  3. Development Project of Ministry of Education Innovation Team [IRT1073]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aiming to explore novel anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase ROS (ROS1) dual inhibitors to overcome crizotinib-resistant mutants, two series of 2,4-diarylaminopyrimidine (DAAP) analogues bearing thiazole or 1,2,3-triazole moieties were designed and synthesized based upon the cocrystal structure of ceritinib with ALK(WT) (PDB 4MKC) as well as the binding model of ceritinib with ALK(G1202R). The cellular and enzymatic assays validated 34c (WY-135) as a promising ALK (IC50 = 1.4 nM) and ROS1 (IC50 1.1 nM) dual inhibitor superior to crizotinib and ceritinib. 34c showed significantly inhibitory activities on ALK-dependent cell lines KARPAS299 (IC50 = 21 nM) and H2228 (IC50 = 95 nM) as well as ROS1-positive cell line HCC78 (IC50 = 40 nM). In particular, 34c was potent against a variety of frequently observed crizotinib-resistant mutants, particularly the L1196M mutant (IC50 = 3.1 nM) identified as the gatekeeper mutation and the G1202R mutant (IC50 = 8.7 nM) which conferred resistance to all clinical stage ALK inhibitors. Furthermore, 34c was capable of inducing cell apoptosis and strongly inhibiting cellular ALK and ROS1 activity. In addition, the binding models of 34c with ALK(WT), ALK(L1196M) and ALK(G1202R) provided structural bases for SARs observations. (C) 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据