4.5 Article

Aberrant cell signalling in PBMCs upon IFN- stimulation in primary Sjogren's syndrome patients associates with type I interferon signature

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 48, 期 7, 页码 1217-1227

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.201747213

关键词

Autoantibodies; Extraglandular manifestations; Phosphoflow; Sjogren's syndrome; Type I interferon

资金

  1. EU [H2020-SC1-2016-RTD/731944]
  2. Broegelmann Foundation
  3. Western Norway Regional Health Authorities [912065]
  4. University of Bergen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Primary Sjogren's syndrome (pSS) is a complex systemic autoimmune disease with heterogeneous disease manifestations. Genetic predisposition, hormonal and environmental factors are all thought to contribute to disease etiology and pathogenesis. A better understanding of the disease pathogenesis is required in order to establish new targeted therapies. We analysed MAPK/ERK and JAK/STAT signalling networks in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) upon stimulation with interferon alpha 2b (IFN-2b) by flow cytometry to define potentially dysfunctional intracellular signalling pathways involved in disease pathogenesis. Cells derived from pSS patients displayed small but significant increases in basal phosphorylation levels of numerous signalling proteins compared to cells from healthy donors. The phosphorylation profiles following stimulation with IFN2b differed significantly between pSS patients and healthy donors, especially regarding STAT1 Y701. PCA further grouped patients according to clinical characteristics. Type I IFN induced gene expression was found to negatively correlate with the IFN-2b induced phosphorylation of STAT3 S727 in T cells and positively with pSTAT1 Y701 in B cells. Increases in pSTAT1 Y701 were associated with the presence of autoantibodies. Our results indicate involvement of both STAT3 S727 and STAT1 Y701 pathways in pSS patients. Therapies targeting these pathways might therefore be beneficial for certain subgroups of patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据