4.3 Article

Primary biliary cholangitis is more severe in previous hepatitis B virus infection patients

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001100

关键词

hepatitis B virus; liver biopsy; noninvasive score; primary biliary cholangitis; severe

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project [ZX100002002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between previous hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and the severity of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Patients and methods A total of 379 HBsAg-negative PBC patients were investigated between 2012 and 2017 in this study. Fifty-two of these patients underwent liver biopsy. The enrolled patients were divided into an anti-HBc-positive group and an anti-HBc-negative group; the patients with liver biopsy were further divided into early stage (stage I) and advanced stage (stages II, III, and IV) according to histological assessment. Liver fibrosis was also assessed by noninvasive prognosis scores including the Mayo Risk Score, the Newcastle model, the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index, the fibrosis index based on the four factors (FIB-4), and the albumin-bilirubin score. The difference in disease stage between the two groups was assessed by histological stage and noninvasive scores predicting fibrosis. Results The histology showed that more patients in the anti-HBc-positive group had advanced stage compared with anti-HBc-negative patients (P < 0.05). Higher Mayo Risk Score, the Newcastle model, aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index, and fibrosis index based on the four factors (all P < 0.05) were obtained in all patients except for the albumin-bilirubin score (P = 0.096). Conclusion Previous HBV infection was associated with a worse histological stage and advanced fibrosis score of PBC. It appears that the previous HBV infection may have aggravated the PBC severity, potentially leading to poorer outcomes. Copyright (C) 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据