4.5 Article

Physical activity but not sedentary time is associated with vitamin D status in adolescents: study of cardiovascular risk in adolescents (ERICA)

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 73, 期 3, 页码 432-440

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41430-018-0192-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. FINEP [01090421]
  2. Brazilian National Council for Technological and Scientific Development-CNPq [565037/2010-2, 405009/2012-7, 457050/2013-6]
  3. CAPES
  4. CNPq

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/objectives The association between active lifestyle components and vitamin D status in adolescents remains relatively unexplored. We aimed to investigate independent and joint associations of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and screen time with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations in adolescents. Methods This multicenter cross-sectional study involved 1152 Brazilian adolescents (age 12-17 years). Serum 25(OH)D was measured in a single laboratory and categorized as <= 20, 21-29, or >= 30 ng/mL. Demographic and lifestyle characteristics were assessed by self-reports. Ordered logistic regression was used to investigate potential associations of being physically active (MVPA >= 300 min/week) and excessive screen time (>2 h/day) with serum 25(OH)D concentrations. Results The prevalence of higher serum 25(OH)D concentrations (>= 30 ng/mL) was 36.4%. In adjusted models, being physically active was associated with higher serum 25(OH)D concentrations only in boys [proportional odds ratio (POR) = 2.04, 95% CI 1.42-2.93], while excessive screen time was not associated with serum 25(OH)D. Adolescents who were physically active and limited their screen time had higher odds of a higher serum 25(OH)D concentration, but the association was significant only for boys (POR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.19-3.74). Conclusions MVPA may play an important role in increasing serum 25(OH)D concentrations in adolescence, especially for boys, regardless of screen time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据