4.5 Article

High-tech firms' international acquisition performance: The influence of host country property rights protection

期刊

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 556-566

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.10.013

关键词

High-tech firms; Host-country institutions; International acquisition; Post-acquisition performance; Property rights protection

类别

资金

  1. General Research Fund (GRF) of Hong Kong, China [457612]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prior research suggests that high-tech firms tend to encounter market transaction uncertainties in countries with weak property rights protection (PRP) and that transaction costs will increase significantly with such uncertainties. Basing our study on high-tech firms that have recently been increasingly acquiring targets in these countries, we explain this puzzling phenomenon. In particular, we investigate whether and how high-tech firms can gain value from acquiring targets in host countries with different degrees of PRP. In addition to transaction costs, we take into account market demands for advanced technologies in weak PRP host countries and fierce market competition in strong ones. Overall, we suggest that high-tech firms are likely to increase their performance by acquiring targets in weak PRP host countries where profit-generating opportunities tend to be more frequent than in strong PRP ones. Our theory receives strong empirical support from multilevel analyses of a sample of U.S. information technology (IT) firms' international acquisitions between 1995 and 2004. We also found that firms differ in their capabilities in gaining value in various levels of PRP host countries. When acquirer size increases, acquirers become less able to gain value through acquisitions in host countries with weak PRP; yet when acquirer host country acquisition experience increases, they are more able to gain value through acquisitions in host countries with weak PRP. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据