4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Statistical primer: propensity score matching and its alternatives

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY
卷 53, 期 6, 页码 1112-1117

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy167

关键词

Statistics; Propensity score; Matching; Weighting; Stratification

资金

  1. MRC [MR/J015350/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Propensity score (PS) methods offer certain advantages over more traditional regression methods to control for confounding by indication in observational studies. Although multivariable regression models adjust for confounders by modelling the relationship between covariates and outcome, the PS methods estimate the treatment effect by modelling the relationship between confounders and treatment assignment. Therefore, methods based on the PS are not limited by the number of events, and their use may be warranted when the number of confounders is large, or the number of outcomes is small. The PS is the probability for a subject to receive a treatment conditional on a set of baseline characteristics (confounders). The PS is commonly estimated using logistic regression, and it is used to match patients with similar distribution of confounders so that difference in outcomes gives unbiased estimate of treatment effect. This review summarizes basic concepts of the PS matching and provides guidance in implementing matching and other methods based on the PS, such as stratification, weighting and covariate adjustment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据