4.4 Article

Association of electromyographic activation patterns with pain and functional disability in people with chronic neck pain

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 118, 期 7, 页码 1481-1492

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-018-3878-z

关键词

Chronic neck pain; Muscle activation; Pain intensity; Functional disability; Cervical movements; Upper limb lifting task

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the activation patterns of the cervical and thoracic muscles in people with and without chronic neck pain during functional activities and their associations with pain intensity and functional disability. Thirty-four adults with chronic neck pain and 34 asymptomatic adults were recruited. They were requested to perform active cervical movements and an upper limb lifting task. Electromyographic activation patterns (EMG) of bilateral upper trapezius, cervical erector spinae, sternocleidomastoid, and thoracic erector spinae were recorded during these tasks. Correlation and multiple regression analysis were used to examine the associations between EMG variables and severity of pain and functional disability. When performing the cervical movements, the neck pain group displayed lower EMG activity levels, especially in the cervical and thoracic extensors. In addition, significantly prolonged activation was observed in seven of the ten muscles during the upper limb lifting task. The changes in EMG amplitude and activation duration were found to be significantly correlated with severity of pain (R (2) = 0.716) and functional disability (R (2) = 0.623). Significant differences in the activation patterns of multiple cervical and thoracic muscles were found in individuals with neck pain compared with those without neck pain. These were significantly associated with their degree of pain and functional limitation. The findings of this study highlight the importance of assessing and optimising the neuromuscular activation of these muscles in the rehabilitation of those suffering from chronic neck pain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据