4.5 Article

Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to fairness norm violations in antisocial offenders

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00406-018-0878-2

关键词

Medial frontal negativity; Ultimatum game; Dictator game; Social decision-making; Fairness norms; Antisocial personality disorder

资金

  1. Postgraduate Research Grants Program of Baden-Wurttemberg
  2. FAZIT foundation
  3. Promotion of Junior Researchers Program at the University of Tubingen
  4. LEAD Graduate School, a project of the Excellence Initiative of the German federal and state governments [GSC1028]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antisocial personality disorder is characterized by a stable, lifelong pattern of disregard for and violation of others' rights. Disruptions in the representation of fairness norms may represent a key mechanism in the development and maintenance of this disorder. Here, we investigated fairness norm considerations and reactions to their violations. To examine electrophysiological correlates, we assessed the medial frontal negativity (MFN), an event-related potential previously linked to violations of social expectancy and norms. Incarcerated antisocial violent offenders (AVOs, n = 25) and healthy controls (CTLs, n = 24) acted as proposers in the dictator game (DG) and ultimatum game (UG) and received fair vs. unfair UG offers from either another human (social context) or a computer (non-social context). Results showed that AVOs made lower offers in the DG but not the UG, indicating more rational and strategic behavior. Most importantly, when acting as recipients in the UG, acceptance rates were modulated by social context in CTLs, while AVOs generally accepted more offers. Correspondingly, ERP data indicated pronounced MFN amplitudes following human offers in CTLs, whereas MFN amplitudes in AVOs were generally reduced. The current data suggest intact fairness norm representations but altered reactions to their violation in antisocial personality disorder.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据