4.7 Article

Physical simulation of temperature influence on methane sorption and kinetics in coal: Benefits of temperature under 273.15 K

期刊

FUEL
卷 158, 期 -, 页码 207-216

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.05.011

关键词

Coalbed methane; Low temperature; Sorption; Kinetics; Freezing core sample

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51274090]
  2. State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base for Gas Geology and Gas Control (Henan Polytechnic University - China) [WS2012B01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To decrease the lost gas content in the core sampling process and make the lost gas content estimation more accurate in CBM (coalbed methane) gas-in-place estimation, the freezing core sampling technique (FCST) is proposed for coal core sampling and physical simulation of the technique is conducted. The low temperature influence on methane adsorption capacity and kinetic properties in crushed coal are investigated. Isothermal adsorption tests under low temperatures (from 243.15 K to 303.15 K) were conducted. Test results support that the low temperature (under 273.15 K) greatly inhibits methane transport in coal while enhancing methane adsorption capacity in coal. Due to its unique temperature independence the mean isosteric heat of adsorption is used to evaluate adsorptivity of coal, and the mean isosteric heat of adsorption of the tested anthracite is 23.31 kJ/mol. The low temperature (under 273.15 K) decreases kinetic parameters, such as diffusion content and the diffusion coefficient, in the isothermal diffusion process. The diffusion content is controlled by both temperature and pressure, and high pressure weakens the temperature effect on diffusion content in coal. Diffusion coefficients decrease from 5.13 x 10(-12) cm(2)/s to 3.34 x 10(-12) cm(2)/s when temperature decreases from 303.15 K to 233.15 K. Therefore, this study suggests that using the freezing core sampling technique can be implemented in future underground coal core sampling. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据