4.7 Article

Catalytic decarboxylation of naphthenic acids in crude oils

期刊

FUEL
卷 158, 期 -, 页码 113-121

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.05.016

关键词

Naphthenic corrosion; TAN; ESI(-)FT-ICR MS; Catalytic decarboxylation

资金

  1. PETROBRAS/CENPES
  2. CNPq
  3. FAPEG
  4. FAPES
  5. CAPES
  6. FINEP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Naphthenic acids are recognized as the main corrosive species in acidic crude oils, although they represent less than 3 wt%. Alternative methods have been developed in an attempt to remove naphthenic acids from the oil, however, their implementation in petrochemical industry still represents a challenge. Herein, a sub-product of the steel industry, steel slag, is evaluated as an economic alternative catalyst and environmentally feasible to remove naphthenic acids present in crude oils. A high-acidity crude oil (TAN = 4.79 mg KOH g(-1) and S = 1.022 wt%) was submitted to thermo-catalytic process at 300 and 350 degrees C during 2, 4 and 6 h and its degradation products were monitored by negative-ion electrospray ionization (ESI) Fourier transform ion cyclotron mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS), total acid number (TAN) and total sulfur. The main crystalline phases detected by X-ray diffractometry in the catalyst were calcite (CaCO3), silica (SiO2) and magnesia (MgO). Among them, the MgO contributes effectively to promote the thermo-catalytic decarboxylation of naphthenic acid species, with a TAN reduction of 43.50% (4.79 -> 1.89 mg KOH g(-1)) from the original oil to the degraded oil obtained after treatment at 350 degrees C for 4 h. Acid species with lower pK(a) values were selectively removed with the ESI(-)FT-ICR MS data confirming an increase in the DBE values from 1-5 to 5-18 for O-2 class. Therefore, the catalyst selectively promoted the removal of naphthenic acids via (i) neutralization reaction; (ii) cracking reaction and (iii) MgCO3 formation from CO2 molecules produced by a previous thermal decarboxylation reaction. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据