4.7 Article

Production of aromatic hydrocarbons from catalytic co-pyrolysis of biomass and high density polyethylene: Analytical Py-GC/MS study

期刊

FUEL
卷 139, 期 -, 页码 622-628

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.09.052

关键词

Aromatic hydrocarbons; Catalytic co-pyrolysis; Corn stalk; High density polyethylene; HZSM-5 catalyst

资金

  1. National Natural Science Fund Program of China [51276040]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2013CB228106]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. scientific innovation research program of college graduate in Jangsu province [KYLX_0183]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to promote efficient production of aromatic hydrocarbons, catalytic co-pyrolysis of corn stalk and high density polyethylene (HDPE) over HZSM-5 zeolite catalyst was performed using quantitative Py-GC/MS. For the catalytic fast pyrolysis (CFP) of HDPE, the relative content of aromatic hydrocarbons tended to increase at first and then decreased gradually. For the catalytic co-pyrolysis (co-CFP) of biomass and HDPE, the effects of co-CFP temperature and mass ratio of biomass to HDPE (biomass/HDPE ratio) on the relative content and economic potential of aromatic hydrocarbons were investigated, and the experimental results showed that the highest relative content of aromatic hydrocarbons was obtained at the temperature of 500-600 degrees C, whereas 700 degrees C was optimal when the yield of total organic pyrolysis products was taken into account. In addition, the relative contents and value index (VI) of target products remained virtually constant when the biomass/HDPE ratio was > 1:1, but then increased with decreasing biomass/HDPE ratio when this mass ratio was < 1:1. The hydrogen to carbon effective ratio (H/C-eff ratio) of feedstock should be adjusted to be > 1.0 so that high relative contents and VI of aromatic hydrocarbons could be achieved. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据