4.5 Article

The Science and Policy of the Verified Carbon Standard Methodology for Tidal Wetland and Seagrass Restoration

期刊

ESTUARIES AND COASTS
卷 41, 期 8, 页码 2159-2171

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12237-018-0429-0

关键词

Greenhouse gas accounting; Carbon sequestration; Methane and nitrous oxide emissions; Allochthonous carbon; Blue carbon; Coastal restoration

资金

  1. National Estuarine Research Reserve System Science Collaborative program
  2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Office of Habitat Conservation
  3. Ocean Foundation
  4. Curtis and Edith Munson Foundation
  5. Maryland Department of Natural Resources Power Plant Research Program
  6. KBR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The restoration of tidal wetland and seagrass systems has the potential for significant greenhouse gas benefits, but project-level accounting procedures have not been available at an international scale. In this paper, we describe the Verified Carbon Standard Methodology for Tidal Wetland and Seagrass Restoration, which provides greenhouse gas accounting procedures for marsh, mangrove, tidal forested wetland, and seagrasses systems across a diversity of geomorphic conditions and restoration techniques. We discuss and critique the essential science and policy elements of the methodology and underlying knowledge gaps. We developed a method for estimating mineral-protected (recalcitrant) allochthonous carbon in tidal wetland systems using field-collected soils data and literature-derived default values of the recalcitrant carbon that accompanies mineral deposition. We provided default values for methane emissions from polyhaline soils but did not provide default values for freshwater, oligohaline, and mesohaline soils due to high variability of emissions in these systems. Additional topics covered are soil carbon sequestration default values, soil carbon fate following erosion, avoided losses in organic and mineral soils, nitrous oxide emissions, soil profile sampling methods, sample size, prescribed fire, additionality, and leakage. Knowledge gaps that limit the application of the methodology include the estimation of CH4 emissions from fresh and brackish tidal wetlands, lack of validation of our approach for the estimation of recalcitrant allochthonous carbon, understanding of carbon oxidation rates following drainage of mineral tidal wetland soils, estimation of the effects of prescribed fire on soil carbon stocks, and the analysis of additionality for projects outside of the USA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据