4.7 Article

The mass transfer of sugar in sweet sorghum stalks for solid-state fermentation process

期刊

FUEL
卷 144, 期 -, 页码 90-95

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.12.023

关键词

Solid state fermentation; Kinetic model; Sweet sorghum; Sugar

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2012AA101805, 2012DFG61720, 2013DFA60470]
  2. Technology New Innovations Development Base Project [Z131109002813080]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solid-state fermentation of sweet sorghum stalk is a cost-effective technology for bioethanol production. Sugar transfer from the interior of sweet sorghum plant cell to the surface is one of the key factors affecting the fermentation process because the system takes place in the absence of free water. Mass transfer of sugar from the interior of the sweet sorghum to the surface of substrates is mainly driven by the sugar concentration gradient. A mass transfer model based on three steps process was developed. Taking into consideration of the different tissue structures of sweet sorghum stalks, a two simultaneous first-order kinetic model of sugar transfer with two parameters characterizing the tissue structure difference was developed to describe the sugar transfer process in sweet sorghum. Solid-liquid extraction experiments were used to gather experimental kinetics data of sugar transfer. Four factors impacting the mass transfer of sugar including particle sizes, stirring speed, temperature, and osmotic pressure were investigated. The results showed that the newly modified model fitted well the kinetics of sugar transfer in different varieties of sweet sorghum. This model could be helpful in optimizing solid state fermentation of sweet sorghum stalks. Moreover, the kinetic model with the added structural parameters based on difference in plant tissue structure can also be used to describe the extraction of any active substance from types of feedstocks with similar chemical compositions and biomass structures. (c) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据