4.4 Article

A Method of Applying Flight Data to Evaluate Landing Operation Performance

期刊

ERGONOMICS
卷 62, 期 2, 页码 171-180

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1502806

关键词

Flight data; flight operation; landing safety; performance evaluation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1733117]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFB0502405]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pilots' operation has an important effect on flight safety and performance, particularly in the final landing stage when pilots need to deal with complicated operations. This study aims to determine the potential value of flight data and develop a method of evaluating a pilot's performance during landing phase based on flight quick access recorder (QAR) data from the perspective of risk assessment. First, a Landing Operation Performance Evaluation Model was developed based on risk evaluation principles. Three landing parameters, which are touchdown distance, touchdown vertical acceleration and touchdown pitch angle, were selected as indicators to evaluate the pilots' landing operation performance in this model. Second, the flight landing operation performance evaluation system (FLOPES) was set up based on the evaluation model. Test results showed that FLOPES can accomplish all calculation flow of operation performance evaluation. Finally, it concluded that this method is a more accurate and effective way for evaluating the landing operation performance of a flight. It could be as a practical tool for airlines to manage landing risk quantitatively and to provide a more practical support for improving training and design in aviation.Practitioner summary: This study aims to determine the potential value of flight data and to develop a method of evaluating pilot's landing operation performance from the risk evaluation perspective. Test results showed that this method is effective and could be as a practical tool for airlines to manage landing risk and improve training.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据