4.7 Article

Interactions between corncob and lignite during temperature-programmed co-pyrolysis

期刊

FUEL
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 102-108

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.11.003

关键词

Corncob; Lignite; Co-pyrolysis; Interaction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21176165, U1261110]
  2. Research Fund for Doctoral Program of High Education [20111402110009]
  3. Shanxi Province Basic Conditions Platform for Science and Technology Project [2012091018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interactions between feedstocks during pyrolysis of coal-biomass blends, and their impacts on product distribution and conversion behavior during utilization, need to be understood if we are to successfully develop systems for the effective co-utilization of biomass and coal. A novel two-stage fixed-bed reactor containing three quartz tubes was designed and used in this study to investigate these interactions, with particular emphasis on the impact on product distribution and char properties. The results show that interactions exist during co-pyrolysis of corncob and lignite blends, which increase overall tar yields and decrease overall gas yields compared with those obtained from pyrolysis of unblended feedstocks, with the interactions between corncob volatiles and lignite playing a dominant role. It is also shown that interactions between chars and volatiles can impact on the reactivity of chars to O-2. Consistent with our expectations, there is a link between potassium content in char and its reactivity; however, it is found that for lignite chars in particular the potential impact of potassium is dominated by the changes of char chemical structure. The effect of potassium content is the opposite to that of char chemical structure, leading to significant complexity in determining the net result of any co-pyrolysis interactions on char reactivity. This highlights the importance of understanding these complex interactions to develop the industrial scale co-gasification systems and adjust the distributions of products. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据