4.7 Article

MASSIVE RELIC GALAXIES CHALLENGE THE CO-EVOLUTION OF SUPER-MASSIVE BLACK HOLES AND THEIR HOST GALAXIES

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 808, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/808/1/79

关键词

accretion, accretion disks; black hole physics; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: nuclei; galaxies: stellar content

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [23224005]
  2. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO) [AYA2009-11137, AYA2011-25527, AYA2013-48226-C3-1-P]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study a sample of eight massive galaxies that are extreme outliers (3-5s) in the M-center dot-Mbulge local scaling relation. Two of these galaxies are confirmed to host extremely large super-massive black holes (SMBHs), whereas the virial mass estimates for the other six are also consistent with having abnormally large SMBHs. From the analysis of their star formation histories and their structural properties, we find that all of these extreme outliers can be considered to be relic galaxies from the early (z similar to 2) universe: i.e., they are compact (R-e < 2 kpc) and have purely old stellar populations (t greater than or similar to 10 Gyr). In order to explain the nature of such deviations from the local relations, we propose a scenario in which the hosts of these uber-massive SMBHs are galaxies that have followed a different evolutionary path than the two-phase growth channel assumed for massive galaxies. Once the SMBH and the core of the galaxy are formed at z similar to 2, the galaxy skips the second phase, remaining structurally untouched and without further mass and size increase. We show that if the outliers had followed the normal evolutionary path by growing in size via merger activity, the expected (mild) growth in mass would place them closer to the observed local relations. Our results suggest that the SMBH growth epoch for the most massive galaxies stopped similar to 10 Gyr ago.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据