4.6 Article

Effects of diesel exhaust particles on the expression of tau and autophagy proteins in human neuroblastoma cells

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2018.06.007

关键词

Beclin 1; Central nervous system; Inflammation; Neurotoxicity; Oxidative stress

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [104-2621-M-038-002-MY3, 105-2633-B-038-001]
  2. Taipei Medical University Wan Fang Hospital [107TMU-WFH-11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Particulate air pollution is recognized as a potential risk factor for neurological disorders; however, the underlying mechanisms of neurodegenerative diseases that occur due to particulate air pollution remain unclear. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the neurotoxic effects caused by diesel exhaust particles (DEPs). We determined the ability of DEPs and carbon black (CB) to induce neurotoxicity, oxidative stress and inflammation, and to disrupt the expression of tau and autophagy proteins in human neuroblastoma IMR-32 cells. Spherical CB (dominated by C, N, and S) and DEPs (dominated by C, N, and 0) in aggregates were observed using a field emission-scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) equipped with energy-dispersive x-ray (EDX) microanalysis. Cell viability was significantly decreased by CB and DEPs in IMR-32 cells, but neither particle altered malondialdehyde (MDA) production. We observed that exposure to DEPs significantly increased 8-iso-prostane and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha levels. Significantly increased expression of tau was induced in IMR-32 cells by DEPS but not by CB. Expression of beclin 1 was increased by DEPs, whereas the light chain 311 (LC3II)/LC3I ratio was increased by CB. Results of the present study suggested that DEP5 induced neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and neurodegenerative-related tau overexpression and regulation by autophagy in IMR-32 cells. We demonstrated that DEPs are able to induce neurotoxicity, which could be associated with the development of neurodegenerative diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据