4.4 Article

Demonstration of the ability of the bacterial polysaccharide FucoPol to flocculate kaolin suspensions

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY
卷 41, 期 3, 页码 287-295

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2018.1497710

关键词

Kaolin; flocculation; Enterobacter A47; exopolysaccharide; FucoPol

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007728]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [CTM/LA0025/2013-14, IF/00589/2015, SFRH/BD/115173/2016, SFRH/BD/131947/2017, UID/AGR/04129/2013, UID/Multi/04378/2013]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/EIA/68489/2006, SFRH/BD/131947/2017, POSC/EEA-SRI/61911/2004, SFRH/BD/115173/2016, UID/Multi/04378/2013] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the flocculation properties of FucoPol, a bacterial extracellular polysaccharide, were investigated. FucoPol is a high molecular weight polymer and negatively charged due to the presence of glucuronic acid and the acyl groups succinyl and pyruvyl. High flocculation rate values (>70%) were achieved with a low bioflocculant dosage of 1 mg/L, for pH values in the range 3-5 and temperature within 15-20 degrees C. The bioflocculant was also shown to be stable after freezing/thawing and heating up to 100 degrees C. Given the polymer's anionic character, the size of flocs formed and their surface profile, bridging seems to be the main flocculation mechanism of FucoPol. This study demonstrated that FucoPol is a promising natural, biodegradable and biocompatible alternative to the currently used synthetic or inorganic hazardous products, with potential to be used as a novel flocculation agent in several applications, such as water treatment, food or mining. Further studies will involve evaluating the reduction of cation dosage on flocculation efficiency, as well as testing the applicability of FucoPol to flocculate different types of suspended solids, such as, for example, activated carbons, soil solids or yeast cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据