4.4 Article

Adsorption behaviours and mechanisms of heavy metal ions' impact on municipal waste composts with different degree of maturity

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY
卷 40, 期 22, 页码 2962-2976

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2018.1458908

关键词

Municipal waste; secondary compost; heavy metal; adsorption mechanism; competitive adsorption

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Composting may change the adsorption characteristics and mechanisms of organic materials due to their differences in organic chemical functional groups and surface structures. The adsorption properties of heavy metals onto the municipal solid waste compost (MSW-C) and its secondary fermentation form (MSW-SC) were comparatively investigated in single, binary and multiple solutions by batch experiments. In the single-metal system, the maximum adsorption capacities of Cu, Zn, Cd and Ni onto MSW-SC were 29.2, 26.3, 38.1 and 22.0 mg g(-1), respectively, and showed higher than that of MSW-C. The adsorption fitted best with the pseudo-second-order kinetics and Langmuir isotherms. The competitive adsorption results indicated that the composts exhibited good selectivity in the adsorption of Cu over Cd, Zn and Ni; thus, for the quaternary-metal systems, the adsorption sequence was Cu > Zn > Cd > Ni. Humic acid content, cation exchange capacity and surface area were increased following the secondary composting. FTIR analysis indicated amine and aromatic compounds were main binding sites accounting for metal sorption. SEM-EDX analysis suggested that the MSW-SC had rough surfaces and stronger adsorption capacity. Decreasing percentage of exchangeable metals was found in the metal-loaded MSW-SC based on a speciation analysis. This study highlights the interactive impacts of different metals during adsorption by compost with different maturity, the secondary composting process was a multifunctional improvement of sorption characteristics and MSW-SC was developed to be a highly efficient biosorbent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据