4.7 Article

Nanocomposite Au NP/TiO2 thin film in the efficient remediation of aqueous solutions contaminated with emerging micro-pollutants

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 25, 期 20, 页码 20125-20140

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-2215-8

关键词

Emerging water pollutants; Nanocomposite Au NPs/TiO2; Degradation kinetics; Mineralization; Stability of catalysts

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present communication specifically aims to synthesize novel nanocomposite material Au NPs/TiO2 in a simple template process using the polyethylene glycol as filler media. The thin film of the nanocomposite material was characterized by the advanced analytical tools. The surface morphology was obtained by the scanning electron microscopic (SEM) and transmission electron microscopic (TEM) images of solids. Similarly, the surface topography and roughness of solid were obtained by the atomic force microscopic (AFM) image of thin film. X-ray diffraction (XRD) data enabled to confirm that the TiO2 was predominantly present with its anatase phase. The specific surface area and pore size of the solid were obtained using the N-2 adsorption/desorption data. Nanocomposite Au NP/TiO2 thin film was employed in the photocatalytic removal of sulfamethoxazole and triclosan from aqueous solutions using less harmful UV-A light (lambda(max)= 330 nm). Various physicochemical parametric studies enabled to deduce the mechanism involved in the degradation process. The degradation kinetics as a function of pH (pH 4.0-10.0) and micro-pollutant concentrations (0.5-15.0 mg/L) was extensively studied. The mineralization of these pollutants was obtained using the non-purgeable organic carbon (NPOC) data. The stability of thin film was assessed by the repeated operations, and presence of several co-existing ions simulates the studies to real matrix treatment. Further, the presence of scavengers enabled to pin point the radical-induced degradation of sulfamethoxazole and triclosan from aqueous solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据