4.7 Article

A new decentralized biological treatment process based on activated carbon targeting organic micropollutant removal from hospital wastewaters

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 1214-1223

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-2670-2

关键词

Organic micropollutants; Removal mechanisms; Biotransformation; Cometabolism; Advanced treatments; Pharmaceuticals

资金

  1. Consellería de Cultura, Educación e Ordenación Universitaria, Xunta de Galicia [AGRUP2015/02, GRC2013-032] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad [CTQ2016-80847-R] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although hospital wastewaters (HWWs) are usually discharged in urban sewage systems, their separate treatment has several benefits, such as the specific treatment of potential toxics as well as avoidance of further dilutions. In this work, an integrated industrial pilot plant (2200 L) corresponding to the technology SeMPAC(R) is proposed and validated for such purpose. The process consists of a sequential batch reactor (SBR) connected to an external submerged microfiltration membrane, in which powdered activated carbon (PAC) is directly added into the biological reactor to enhance the removal of the organic micropollutants (OMPs). The combination of different redox conditions in the SBR, as well as the operation at long sludge retention times (SRTs) and high biomass concentrations favored OMP biotransformation in the SBR, being their final removal efficiencies enhanced clearly after PAC addition, especially for the recalcitrant compounds. A periodical renewal of the adsorbent is necessary to overcome its gradual saturation. The main operational conditions were influenced by (i) the recalcitrant OMP carbamazepine, which defines the PAC dosage; (ii) the easily degradable OMP ibuprofen, which can be used to optimize the duration of the aerobic cycle; and (iii) the denitrification efficiency, which defines the correct time length of the anoxic period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据