4.7 Article

Remediation of arsenic-contaminated paddy soil by iron-modified biochar

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 25, 期 21, 页码 20792-20801

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-2268-8

关键词

Arsenic; Paddy soil; Iron-modified biochar; As fractions; Soil remediation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41771512]
  2. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [28100014]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University [2017zzts598]
  4. open fund for valuable instruments and equipment of Central South University [CSUZC201712]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arsenic contamination in paddy soils has aroused global concern due to its threats to food security and human health. Biochar modified with different iron materials was prepared for arsenic (As) immobilization in contaminated soils. Soil incubation experiments were carried to investigate the effects of biochar modified with Fe-oxyhydroxy sulfate (Biochar-FeOS), FeCl3 (Biochar-FeCl3), and zero-valent iron (Biochar-Fe) on the pH, NaHCO3-extractable As concentrations, and the As fractions in soils. The scanning electron microscope and X-ray diffraction analysis demonstrated that iron was successfully loaded onto the surface or embedded into the pores of the biochar. Addition of Biochar-FeOS, Biochar-FeCl3, and Biochar-Fe had no significant effects on the soil pH but significantly decreased the contents of NaHCO3-extractable As in soils by 13.95-30.35%, 10.97-28.39%, and 17.98-35.18%, respectively. Biochar-FeOS, Biochar-FeCl3, and Biochar-Fe treatments decreased the concentrations of non-specifically sorbed and specifically sorbed As fractions in soils, and increased the amorphous and poorly crystalline, hydrated Fe, Al oxide-bound, and residual As fractions. Compared with the other iron-modified biochars, Biochar-FeOS showed the most effective immobilization and has the potential for the remediation of As-contaminated paddy soils.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据