4.7 Article

Effects of exogenous sulfur on growth and Cd uptake in Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris spp. pekinensis) in Cd-contaminated soil

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 25, 期 16, 页码 15823-15829

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-1712-0

关键词

Cd mobility; Cd uptake; Cd; Chinese cabbage; Fractionation; Soil contamination; Sulfur

资金

  1. National Key Science and Technology Program of China [2015BAD05B02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil pollution with heavy metals has many adverse effects on ecosystem health as well as food security. A pot experiment was performed to investigate the effects of different valence states of exogenous sulfur (S) on the uptake of cadmium (Cd) in Chinese cabbage in Cd-contaminated soil. The results showed that S significantly promoted plant growth in Chinese cabbage, with the following order of magnitude for the different S treatments: sodium sulfite (Na2SO3) > sodium sulfate (Na2SO4) > powdered sulfur (S-0). Additionally, enzyme activity and the content of reductive substances in the leaves markedly increased, while malondialdehyde content significantly decreased; hence, S observably enhanced the ability of Chinese cabbage to tolerate Cd stress. S-0 significantly reduced soil pH, thus increasing the mobility and bioavailability of Cd in the soil, while Na2SO3 increased soil pH, and Na2SO4 had no effect on soil pH. The acid-soluble and oxidizable fractions of Cd in soil increased with the S-0 treatment. The applied Na-2 SO3 and Na2SO4 both increased the residual fraction of Cd in the soil, but they reduced the amount of the acid-extractable, reducible, and oxidizable Cd. The results showed that compared with S-0, the Na2SO3 and Na2SO4 treatments decreased the acid-extractable Cd concentrations by 6.3 and 4%, respectively, in the most contaminated soil. In conclusion, the influence of S on the bioavailability and speciation of Cd varied not only with the soil Cd content but also with the application rate and S valence state.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据