4.8 Article

New Insights on Ecosystem Mercury Cycling Revealed by Stable Isotopes of Mercury in Water Flowing from a Headwater Peatland Catchment

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 52, 期 4, 页码 1854-1861

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b04449

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-1354811, DEB-1353850]
  2. University of North Carolina at Greensboro
  3. China Scholarship Council
  4. Northern Research Station of USDA Forest Service
  5. USDA Forest Service
  6. United States Government
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences
  8. Division Of Environmental Biology [1354811] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stable isotope compositions of mercury (Hg) were measured in the outlet stream and in soil cores at different landscape positions in a 9.7-ha boreal upland-peatland catchment. An acidic permanganate/persulfate digestion procedure was validated for water samples with high dissolved organic matter (DOM) concentrations through Hg spike addition analysis. We report a relatively large variation in mass-dependent fractionation (delta Hg-202; from -2.12 to -1.32 parts per thousand) and a smaller, but significant, variation of mass independent fractionation (Delta Hg-199; from -0.35 to -0.12 parts per thousand) during two years of sampling with streamflow varying from 0.003 to 7.8 L s(-1). Large variations in delta Hg-202 occurred only during low streamflow (<0.6 L which suggest that under high streamflow conditions a peatland lagg zone between the bog (3.0 ha) and uplands (6.7 ha) becomes the dominant source of Hg in downstream waters. Further, a binary mixing model showed that except for the spring snowmelt period, Hg in streamwater from the catchment was mainly derived from dry deposition of gaseous elemental Hg (73-95%). This study demonstrates the usefulness of Hg isotopes for tracing sources of Hg deposition, which can lead to a better understanding of the biogeochemical cycling and hydrological transport of Hg in headwater catchments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据