4.8 Article

Iodoacetic Acid Disrupting the Thyroid Endocrine System in Vitro and in Vivo

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 52, 期 13, 页码 7545-7552

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b01802

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81360421, 81560524]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014T70839, 2013M540686]
  3. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation [2012GXNSFBA053109]
  4. Outstanding Young and Middleaged Excellent Teachers' Training in Higher Education Institutions of Guangxi [GXQG022014019]
  5. Guangxi Medical University Training Program for Distinguished Young Scholars [2017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exposure to drinking water disinfection by-products (DBPs) is potentially associated with adverse developmental effects. Iodoacetic acid (IAA), an unregulated DBP, has been shown to be cytotoxic, mutagenic, genotoxic, and tumorigenic. However, its endocrine-disrupting effects remain unknown. This study evaluated the IAA-induced disruption of the thyroid endocrine system using in vitro and in vivo assays. Rat pituitary tumor GH3 cells were treated with IAA in the presence and absence of triiodothyronine (T3). IAA exposure significantly reduced T3-activated GH3 cell proliferation, indicating the antagonistic activity of IAA in vitro. Sprague-Dawley rats were also subjected to IAA treatment through oral gavage for 28 consecutive days. IAA exposure significantly down-regulated the mRNA expression levels of the thyrotropin receptor (TSHR), the sodium/iodide symporter (NIS), and type I deiodinase and simultaneously reduced the protein expression levels of TSHR and NIS. IAA exposure decreased T3 levels but increased the weights of hypothalamus and the levels of thyrotropin releasing hormone and thyrotropin. In addition, IAA induced the formation of smaller and more depleted follicles or even vacuolization in the thyroid. These results suggested that IAA potentially disrupts the thyroid endocrine system both in vitro and in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据