4.8 Review

Capture-Ferment-Upgrade: A Three-Step Approach for the Valorization of Sewage Organics as Commodities

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 52, 期 12, 页码 6729-6742

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b05712

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen) [1S23018N, 11M5415N]
  2. Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds [BOF15/PDO/068]
  3. FWO-MOST project (Research Foundation Flanders) [G.0535.13]
  4. VLAIO-CATALISTI via the CATALISTI ICON grant CAPRA - Upgrading steel mill off gas to caproic acid and derivatives using anaerobic technology [HBC.2017.0440]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This critical review outlines a roadmap for the conversion of chemical oxygen demand (COD) contained in sewage to commodities based on three-steps: capture COD as sludge, ferment it to volatile fatty acids (VFA), and upgrade VFA to products. The article analyzes the state-of-the-art of this three step approach and discusses the bottlenecks and challenges. The potential of this approach is illustrated for the European Union's 28 member states (EU-28) through Monte Carlo simulations. High-rate contact stabilization captures the highest amount of COD (66-86 g COD person equivalent(-1) day(-1) in 60% of the iterations). Combined with thermal hydrolysis, this would lead to a VFA-yield of 23-44 g COD person equivalent(-1) day(-1). Upgrading VFA generated by the EU-28 would allow, in 60% of the simulations, for a yearly production of 0.2-2.0 megatonnes of esters, 0.7-1.4 megatonnes of polyhydroxyalkanoates or 0.6-2.2 megatonnes of microbial protein substituting, respectively, 20-273%, 70-140% or 21-72% of their global counterparts (i.e., petrochemical-based esters, bioplastics or fishmeal). From these flows, we conclude that sewage has a strong potential as biorefinery feedstock, although research is needed to enhance capture, fermentation and upgrading efficiencies. These developments need to be supported by economic/environmental analyses and policies that incentivize a more sustainable management of our resources.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据